Legal Opinion

Thigpen v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1909PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Goliad County. Tried below before Hon. James C. Wilson.

1Opinion of the Court

REESE, Associate Justice.

In this case appellants, heirs at law of John Thigpen, deceased, seek to have partitioned between themselves a tract of 200 acres of land, the homestead of said John Thigpen during his lifetime and at the time of his death. The defendants are Mrs. 8. A. Russell, the widow of said Thigpen, and A. 8. Russell, her husband. After the death of Thigpen, as the result of partition proceedings between his heirs and his widow, the 200 acres in controversy, which was the separate property of John Thigpen, was set apart-to his widow as her homestead so long as she should elect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. CassidayTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Foreman v. MeroneyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Woolfolk v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Johnston v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Reece v. RenfroTexas Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Good v. GoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Jolesch & Chaska Co. v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. O'Fiel v. JanesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Keller v. LindowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Lewis v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API