Legal Opinion

Barth v. Addie Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLotjghran, J.

Plaintiff was a member of a union of moving picture machine operators in the city of New York. Defendant, an owner of motion picture theatres in that city, made a contract with the union for the exclusive employment of its members as moving picture machine operators for the year beginning September 1, 1933. On that date the plaintiff and five other members of the union became employed by the defendant under the contract, each at a weekly wage thereby fixed.

On September 3,1933, the defendant, without notice to any one, undertook to reduce the wage schedules established by the contract. Against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Warth v. . LiebovitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parker v. BorockNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Zdanok v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Harold N. Holt v. Seversky Electronatom CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Berry v. 34 Irving Place CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API