Legal Opinion

Joseph Sica v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1971No. 71-2528PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a federal prisoner, brought this proceeding under F.R.Cr.P. Rule 35. That rule is not applicable to his claims. However, since the sentencing court addresses itself to the merits of Sica’s claim, and since both sides have fully briefed the issue, we treat this as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The order denying relief is affirmed.

When appellant accepted his release on bail pending appeal, he in effect agreed to staying his sentence. F.R.Cr. P. Rule 38; 18 U.S.C. § 3568. There is no reason for treating time spent on bail as jail time. See, Marchese v. McEachen, 451 F.2d 555 (9th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Michele Marchese v. Angus D. McEachen Chief United States Probation OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Steven Lynn Ramsey v. Edward BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Polakoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Ruben Morales RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Raul Casiano FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API