Legal Opinion

United States v. Raul Casiano Figueroa

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 16, 1987No. 86-1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a denial of a “Motion for Amendment of Records Nunc Pro Tunc,” in effect a request for reduction of federal sentence. Figueroa argued in his pro se motion that he should have received credit against his sentence for the time he spent on conditional release pending trial. The district court rejected this argument; we affirm its decision.

Section 3568 of Title 18, U.S. Code, provides, in relevant part: “The Attorney General shall give [a convicted] person credit toward service of his sentence for any days spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ruben Ortega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Polakoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Ruben Morales RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Alfred Charles Villaume v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. John F. Dawson v. Roger Scott, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Lisa InsleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  3. Ziya K. Koray v. Frank Sizer United States Bureau of Prisons Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Joseph G. ZackularCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. John Law FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API