Legal Opinion

Lancaster City Ordinance Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1956No. Appeals, 337 and 338PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

These two annexation cases were argued together and the appeals, involving a single legal question, will be disposed of in one opinion. The annexations were by ordinances of the City of Lancaster, each of which was introduced before the city council on December 2, 1952, and purported to be adopted on December 5, 1952. They must be declared void.

The Third Class City Code, as amended by the Act of 1951, P. L. 662, §10, 53 PS §12198-1012, provides in part: “No bill shall be passed finally on the same day on which it was introduced. At least three days shall intervene…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gregg's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Troxell v. RAINIER PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Troxell v. Rainier Public School District No. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Davis v. SulcoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Southwest Delaware County Municipal Authority v. Aston TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Simmons v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API