Legal Opinion
United States v. Foerster
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 20, 2007No. 07-0093/ARPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
A general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone convicted Appellant, pursuant to his plea, of a single specification and charge of larceny (on divers occasions), in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921 (2000). Contrary to his pleas, a panel of officers convicted Appellant of making a false official statement, larceny (nine specifications), and forgery (nine specifications), in violation of Articles 107,121 and 123, UCMJ; 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 921, 923. The panel sentenced Appellant to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. William WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. TearmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. BessCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. Sergeant JOHN R. WILLIAMSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. Specialist THOMAS E. RUSSELL, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.