Legal Opinion

Orr v. Orgo

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1971No. 7129DC718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Appellant assigns as error the admission in evidence of various extra-judicial statements purportedly made to plaintiffs by George Mavrode. Mavrode was named a party defendant but was not served with process and was not present at the trial.

The statements in question tended to show, among other things, that in October 1969 Mavrode asked plaintiffs to purchase ivy and evergreens for him and “his company.” Plaintiffs performed as requested and this suit is to recover the commissions which Mavrode allegedly agreed to pay.

Extra-judicial statements of an alleged agent are not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. City of Statesville v. BowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Sealey v. ALBANY INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. D. L. H., Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tate v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API