Legal Opinion
Skretvedt v. EI Dupont De Nemours and Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 6, 2000No. CIV. A. 98-61-MPTPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Orrin T. Skretvedt brought this claim pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., in an attempt to recover long term disability benefits allegedly due him under defendants’ disability plans. Before this court are plaintiffs motion to amend complaint and cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons expressed below, plaintiffs motion to amend and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment are DENIED, and defendants’, E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”); E.I. duPont de Nemours…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Skretvedt v. E.I. DuPont De NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Skretvedt v. Dupont De NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Stanziale v. Dalmia (In Re Allserve Systems Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Rendulic v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001