Rendulic v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
The underlying action is this case presents a challenge to a plan administrator’s decision to deny the Plaintiff, Tracy E. Rendulic’s (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or “Ren-dulic”), request for reinstatement of benefits under a long-term disability policy sponsored by her former employer, the Defendant, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant” or “Kaiser”). Presently pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. 1
I. Background 2
Plaintiff worked as a salaried employee of Kaiser in its former Erie, Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Vilma Lissette Vega Jose Vega v. National Life Insurance Services, Inc., Pan-American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lamanna v. Special Agents Mutual Benefits Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008