Legal Opinion

Rendulic v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 2001No. CIV.A. 99-221 ERIEPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

The underlying action is this case presents a challenge to a plan administrator’s decision to deny the Plaintiff, Tracy E. Rendulic’s (hereinafter “Plaintiff’ or “Ren-dulic”), request for reinstatement of benefits under a long-term disability policy sponsored by her former employer, the Defendant, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant” or “Kaiser”). Presently pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. 1

I. Background 2

Plaintiff worked as a salaried employee of Kaiser in its former Erie, Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Vilma Lissette Vega Jose Vega v. National Life Insurance Services, Inc., Pan-American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lamanna v. Special Agents Mutual Benefits Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API