Legal Opinion

State v. Whisenant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1983No. 72A82PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Defendant presents on appeal two issues to this Court. First, he contends that certain questions by the prosecutor which “put before the jury irrelevant and prejudicial insinuations that the defendant had committed other serious crimes” denied him a fair trial. For the reasons articulated below we do not agree. Defendant also argues that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to strike one of the prosecutor’s arguments which defendant claims “travelled outside the record.” We have examined this contention as well and find that the trial court’s exercise of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. MooseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API