Legal Opinion
Welsh v. Kuntz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 19, 1950No. [No. 210, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
Section 2 of Article 66, Code Supp. 1947, provides that, except as therein provided, no mortgage to secure future loans or advances shall be valid unless the amounts thereof and the times when they are to be made shall be specifically stated in the mortgage. Section 3 of Article 66, Code 1939, provides that in Baltimore and Prince George’s Counties no mortgage shall be a lien for any other sum of money than shall be specified therein to be secured thereby at the time of executing the same; but it does not contain the requirement that a mortgage to secure future loans or advances shall state…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sigal v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- United States v. SischoSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State Tax Commission v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Bureau of Mines v. George's Creek Coal and Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.