Ronald Fournier v. Kathleen Sebelius
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Delores Berg and Thomas DiCecco are Medicare beneficiaries who suffer from medical conditions that caused significant dental problems, and they received dental services to correct those problems. But the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) denied coverage for those services. Appellants contend that this denial was premised on the Secretary’s unreasonable interpretation of the Medicare Act, which contravenes the intent of Congress and violates Appellants’ right to equal protection under the Fifth Amendment. We affirm the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- S. Wilson v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Saved Magazine v. Spokane Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- In re M.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 2015
- Fang Lin Ai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re Derrico G.Illinois Supreme Court · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.