Legal Opinion
Sabo v. Futch
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 8, 1970No. 25746PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Justice.
1. Testimony concerning information acquired solely through books and records kept by a third person is inadmissible, as hearsay. Owsley & Son v. Woolhopter, 14 Ga. 124 (3); Knox Metal Products, Inc. v. Watson, 100 Ga. App. 832, 834 (112 SE2d 295) and cit.; Mary field Plantation v. Harris Gin Co., 116 Ga. App. 744, 747 (159 SE2d 125) and cit.
2. Where, in a case in which the evidence on the main and controlling issue is close and conflicting, hearsay testimony is errroneously admitted as having probative value, and which could have been considered by the trior of fact and have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maryfield Plantation, Inc. v. Harris Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- N. Owsley & Son v. WoolhopterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Knox Metal Products, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- First National Bank v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Wiggins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Mercer v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Cardwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Porterfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.