Porterfield v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Chief Judge.
Billy Ray Porterfield appeals from his conviction by a jury of tbe offense of solicitation of sodomy.
1. The trial court did not err in refusing to admit the results of a polygraph examination into evidence despite the express stipulation between the state and defense counsel that the results would be admissible when the results of such a test were inconclusive. In State v. Chambers, 240 Ga. 76, 79 (239 SE2d 324) (1977), the Supreme Court held that upon express stipulation of the parties results of such a test are admissible and in that case were "... some evidence, though…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Sabo v. FutchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Hurd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Lipscomb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Sisson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.