Legal Opinion

Vandalia Railroad v. Holland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1915No. 22,333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court (20,625); Charles Remster, Judge. Action by John A. Holland against the Vandalia Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

— This is an action by appellee against appellant under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee while in the employ of appellant as a switchman. Verdict and judgment in favor of appellee. The sole error assigned and relied on for reversal in this appeal challenges the action of the lower court in overruling appellant ,’s motion for a new trial.

At the time of the injury the switching crew of which appellee was a member was engaged in switching ears on appellant’s tracks, a short distance west of the union station in the city of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zikos v. Oregon R. & Navigation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1910
  2. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. MaerklCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  3. Colasurdo v. Central R. R. of New JerseyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
  4. Horton v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. American Car & Foundry Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. TrzopIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cleveland,Cincinnati,Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LutzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Payne v. BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API