Legal Opinion
Mastroianni v. Deering
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided November 4, 1993No. Civ. A. CV293-88PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, District Judge.
On June 29, 1993, Plaintiff, Robert Mastroianni (“Mastroianni”), instituted this federal question action against Defendants, alleging violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). Mastroianni claims that Defendants violated his rights under the United States Constitution when they conspired to force Camden County Sheriff William E. Smith (“Sheriff Smith”) out of office by coercing Mastroianni and others to give false testimony against Sheriff Smith. This case is presently before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. DeeringDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994
- Mastroianni v. DeeringDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994
- Tiffany Elaine Thornton v. Limestone County Board of Education, et al.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026