Legal Opinion

Mastroianni v. Deering

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided December 30, 1994No. Civ. A. No. CV293-88Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALAIMO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Robert Mastroianni (“Mastroianni”), Deputy Sheriff of Camden County, Georgia, was arrested on charges that were later nol prossed. On June 29, 1993, Mastroianni filed this federal action against several Defendants pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Mastroianni’s claims include (1) malicious prosecution, (2) abuse of process, (3) false arrest, (4) false imprisonment, and (5) conspiracy to commit the foregoing. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API