Legal Opinion

Hood v. City of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 6, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00232Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Hood, et al., No. 2:23-cv-00232-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 City of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Defendants Sacramento City and Sacramento County move to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims 18 | under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. Defendants also 19 | move to strike portions of plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons below, the court grants in part 20 | defendants’ motions to dismiss and motions to strike. 21 | I. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiffs Susan Hood,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API