Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bolin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1950No. 5358PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

The appellant, Thad M. Moore, who meets the constitutional qualifications to hold the office of Governor of this state, filed his action in the superior court asking for a declaratory judgment. The appellant is at the present time a duly elected, qualified and acting member of the Arizona State Tax Commission. His term of office does not expire until the month of January, ¿953.

Appellee, Wesley Bolin, is the duly elected Secretary of State of the State of Arizona.

Appellant was desirous of seeking the gubernatorial nomination on the democratic ticket at the primary election to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Miller v. MillerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Merkley v. MerkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Taylor v. McSwainArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Morton v. Pacific Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Arizona State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. Phoenix Union High School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Riley v. County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Hunt v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API