Legal Opinion

Ar-Ex Products Co. v. Capital Vitamin & Cosmetic Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 29, 1965No. 6554_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Chief Judge.

This case presents the narrow question whether plaintiff-appellant, a manufacturer who under local law could otherwise enforce fair trade agreements against a nonsigner, General Electric Co. v. Kimball Jewelers, Inc., 1956, 333 Mass. 665, 132 N.E.2d 652, is precluded from so doing because as a matter of regular procedure it replied to individuals inquiring as to the availability of its goods not only with information about local retail outlets, but with offers to sell directly to them in retail quantities.

Although plaintiff’s power to bind signers and nonsigners to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. General Electric Co. v. Kimball Jewelers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Secatore's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  5. Johnson & Johnson v. Avenue Merchandise Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bowen v. New York News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Lepore v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. Upjohn Co. v. Charles Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. M. J. Krutsinger v. Mead Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  5. Franclemont v. Commissioner of Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API