Legal Opinion
M. J. Krutsinger v. Mead Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 29, 1976No. 76-1196, 76-1250PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
This case involves the question whether the defendant Mead Foods, Inc. was guilty of a violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1, as a result of price maintenance arrangements.
Subsidiary questions are, first, whether under the law of Oklahoma there can be an oral agreement giving rise to immunity to antitrust violations under the so-called Miller-Tydings Amendment to Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Second, whether, assuming that an oral contract is adequate, one existed in this case and the defendant-appellee Mead Foods, Inc., here referred to as Mead, is entitled…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Secatore's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Janel Sales Corp. v. Lanvin Parfums, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.