Legal Opinion

Upjohn Co. v. Charles Labs, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 14, 1967No. 65 Civ. 1288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a drug manufacturer, has instituted suit under the Feld-Crawford Act (New York General Business Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 20, §§ 369-*447a, 369-b) to enjoin defendant, a retail druggist, from selling plaintiff’s trademarked products at prices less than those stipulated in plaintiff’s fair trade contracts.

Plaintiff seeks only an injunction.

I find the facts to be as follows:

1. Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, licensed to do business within the State of New York, and maintains an office within…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Secatore's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  4. Upjohn Company v. Liberty Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Mead Johnson & Co. v. West Chester Discount, Health & Vitamin Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sargent-Welch Scientific Company v. Ventron Corporation and Ventron Instruments CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  2. Bowen v. New York News, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. M. J. Krutsinger v. Mead Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API