Legal Opinion

Bold v. Bold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1986No. 809 and 853PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROWLEY, Judge:

This matter comes to us on appeal by Thomas C. Bold (husband), and on cross appeal by Joan M. Bold (wife). Both parties are appealing from the trial court’s order of equitable distribution in this bifurcated action in which a divorce decree has already been granted.

Husband and wife were married on May 16, 1964. They are the parents of one child, Theresa, whom they adopted on August 14, 1970. The parents separated on or about April 21, 1980, and Theresa remained with her father. On May 9, 1980, wife filed a complaint in divorce which was subsequently dismissed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Semasek v. SemasekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Braderman v. BradermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Sergi v. SergiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Barnhart v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Estep v. EstepSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Hutnik v. HutnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Fitzpatrick v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Taxin v. ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API