Legal Opinion

Taxin v. Shoemaker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 On February 28, 2002, Appellant filed a praecipe for entry of judgment on the jury verdict in favor of Appellee, and judgment was entered on the same date. Appellant then filed a notice of appeal on March 1, 2002. Appellee has filed a motion to quash this appeal as untimely.

¶ 2 On November 26, 2001, a jury trial resulted in a verdict in Appellee’s favor. Appellant filed a timely motion for post-trial relief, see Pa.R.C.P. 227.1, and on January 15, 2002, the trial court entered the following order: “AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2002, upon consideration of [Appellant’s] Post-Trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Weiser v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Friedman v. KasserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Bold v. BoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Yon v. YarusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bitner, S. v. Sheehan, J., M.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Blackburn, J. v. King Investment Group, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. One Penn Asso. v. Wasser, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API