Legal Opinion

Reif v. Lafollette

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1943No. 29123PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In December, 1939, the parties to this action entered into a business arrangement involving the production, processing, and marketing of mustard seed. In carrying out the agreement, which was oral and somewhat informal, differences arose, with the result that, in January, 1942, Mr. Reif, the appellant here, brought this action for an accounting. Issues were made up, and the trial began on November 24th. The oral evidence introduced was supplemented by exhibits consisting of voluminous books of account, checks, and similar items. With the approval and consent of counsel for both parties, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Windt v. BannizaWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ihler v. IhlerWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Purse Seine Vessel Owners Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. In Re Halle's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. All-Rite Contracting Co. v. OmeyWashington Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API