Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Acorman v. Pitner

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 12, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

80 N.J. Super. 91 (1963)

193 A.2d 143

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, EX REL., HELOYSE ACORMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ALPHONSE PITNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 6, 1963.

Decided July 12, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

Mr. Ira Rabkin argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Abraham Greenberg argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff instituted an action in the Municipal Court of the City of Camden under N.J.S.A. 9:16-3, by which she sought a determination that defendant is the father of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Kaufman v. PittsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Commonwealth v. DimatteoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Kopak v. PolzerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Commonwealth v. ShimpenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. F. v. M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. City of Philadelphia v. AustinUnited States District Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API