Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dimatteo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1936No. Appeal, 26PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The question involved upon this appeal, as phrased by the representatives of the Commonwealth, reads: “May a defendant be convicted in a prosecution for fornication and bastardy and failure to support an illegitimate child upon the sole' testimony of a prosecutrix, a married woman, who testified that she had sexual intercourse with the defendant as a result of which a child was born unto her; that she has been separated from her husband for a period of three and one-half years, during which time she has not seen her husband or had any sexual relations with him?” The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Dennison v. PageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  3. Lynch v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Dulsky v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Blair v. BuserIndiana Superior Court · 1873

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Manfredi EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Commonwealth v. KerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. GantzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API