Legal Opinion
Michael Rose Productions, Inc. v. Loew's Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendants for a separate trial without a jury or, in the alternative, for an order pursuant to Rule 39(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil *509Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., striking plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial in so far as it concerns the issue of a general release pleaded as a defense in defendants’ amended answers.
The litigation in chief involves a private, civil, antitrust, treble damage action. Defendants’ amended answers plead as an affirmative defense a general release executed by plaintiff in favor of Loew’s Incorporated and United Artists…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bowie v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Radio Corp. of America v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Larsen v. PowellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
- Ross v. Service Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reines Distributors, Inc. v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Schine v. SchineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Bernardo v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- McGraw v. J. Ray McDermott & Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978