Legal Opinion

Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation & Park District

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1976No. Civ. 35733PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether an 11-mile portion of the Russian River is a navigable stream and thus open to the public for boating and recreational activities. We conclude that it is.

Plaintiffs-appellants are persons with varied interests who have joined in this action to protect their right to free and unobstructed navigation on this part of the river. Defendants-respondents are Del Rio Woods Recreation and Park District (the District), a public entity formed pursuant to Public Resources Code section 5780 et seq., and Del Rio Homeowners Association…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Personal Watercraft Coalition v. Marin County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Charpentier v. Von GeldernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Village of Menomonee Falls v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API