Legal Opinion
Kaneda v. Kaneda
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1965No. Civ. 21964PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAT, J. *
— Plaintiff and cross-defendant Yutio Kaneda appeals from a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the real property at issue is held by him and Tamotsu Kaneda for the benefit of the heirs of Kojiro Kaneda deceased and that he is not entitled to a partition of said property.
Questions Presented
1. Is there a resulting trust for Kojiro and his heirs or an express trust for benefit of Yukio and Tamotsu?
2. Did the court fail to find on a material issue — Hoge’s authority ?
3. Is the finding of a resulting trust contrary to law because of the former California Alien Land Act?
4. Does the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Waller v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968