Legal Opinion

Meakim v. Ludwig

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1917No. 14317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Reynolds, J., entered March 29, 1917, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for an injunction, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to restrain interference with the plaintiff’s possession and operation of a shingle mill which he held as trustee. After the issues were framed, the trial resulted in a judgment as prayed for in the complaint. From this judgment, the appeal is prosecuted.

*181The facts may be briefly stated as follows: On the 16th day of December, 1916, and for some time prior thereto, one J. B. McLaren was, and had been, the owner of a shingle mill and of standing timber purchased by him on leased lands for the operation of the shingle mill. This mill was located near Adna, in Lewis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cline Piano Co. v. SherwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Grant v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. BenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Gatt v. HurlburtOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Tomlinson v. BurgessWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API