Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Burgess

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1935No. 25696. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought by appellant Tomlinson, a creditor of Martin Hansen, to set aside a deed and bill of sale from Hansen to respondents as being made to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of Hansen. Hansen died intestate just prior to the commencement of this action and a niece, Elf reda Jensen, was appointed administratrix of his estate. She filed a cross-complaint against respondents seeking the same relief on behalf of creditors of the estate. From an adverse judgment, both join in appealing to this court. Respondents will be mentioned in the singular number, since the husband…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neill v. GrinerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Merrick v. PattisonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Puget Sound National Bank v. MoreWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Samuel v. KittengerWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. BenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. González Díaz v. DescartesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  2. Piacentini v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
  3. González Díaz v. DescartesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API