Stout v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
In his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the court erred in charging the jury on the measure of damages where a contract does not specify the compensation for the services to be rendered under the contract; also, that the court erred in failing to charge the jury on the proper measure of damages.
Among the challenged portions of the court’s charge are the following:
“* * * But, where a person performs services for another at his request and to be paid for it And WheRE The Amount Has Not BeeN ExpRessly Agreed Upon, then the law would say that there would be an obligation to pay…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lindsey v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Thormer v. LEXINGTON MAIL ORDER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jdh Capital, LLC v. FlowersNorth Carolina Business Court · 2009
- John D. Latimer & Associates, Inc. v. Housing Authority of the City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. David G. Allen Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Forbes v. PillmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Forbes v. PillmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.