Legal Opinion

Conley v. Rauschenbach

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1993No. 62813PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

In this court-tried ease, appellant broker sought specific performance of a real estate contract against respondents/sellers. The trial court denied broker’s petition and awarded sellers $6,625 for their attorney fees. Broker appeals. We modify the judgment by deleting the attorney fees award and affirm.

Broker raises four points on appeal. The first two points relate to the trial court’s findings that: (1) Orvin Rauschenbach (father/seller) never signed or accepted the real estate contract; and (2) offers were made to broker that were not conveyed to sellers. The third…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osterberger v. Hites Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Washington University v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Kopp v. FranksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Arnold v. EdelmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Dugger v. WelpMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lucas Stucco & EIFS Design, LLC v. LandauSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Ridgway v. TTnT Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Crawford v. DetringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Fisher v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Wilkerson v. GateleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API