Arnold v. Edelman
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Hattie Arnold recovered judgment against Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, garnishee, in sum $33,881.01, and garnishee has appealed. Edelman-Lyon has appealed from that portion of the judgment denying them attorneys’ fees from garnishee.
Prior to this garnishment proceeding, Hattie Arnold sued Edelman-Lyon for negligent failure to make proper setting of the panic exit device on revolving doors installed by them for the City of Kansas City, Missouri, and obtained judgment for $30,-000 damages which was affirmed on appeal. Arnold v. Edelman, Mo., 375 S.W.2d 167.
It was…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kendrick v. MasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. McCraryTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Berger Bros. Electric Motors, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Osterberger v. Hites Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- David Ranken, Jr. Technical Institute v. BoykinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Harris v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Birdsong v. BydalekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rook v. John F. Oliver Trucking CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.