Lucas Stucco & EIFS Design, LLC v. Landau
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.
A contractor that was unpaid for its work filed suit against a property owner under the Private Prompt Payment Act (act), section 431.180. 1 Although the contractor’s petition properly pleaded the elements of the act, there was no mention of its desire to seek attorney fees other than a specific request in the prayer. The parties dispute whether the contractor is entitled to the attorney fees that the trial court awarded. The judgment is affirmed because the contractor properly pleaded a cause of action under the act, and the specific request in the prayer was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Essex Contracting, Inc. v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Washington University v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Harris v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Miller v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Jerry Bennett Masonry, Inc. v. Crossland Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Berry v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Scheck Industrial Corporation v. Tarlton Corporation, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kris Crutcher v. Multiplan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Monarch Fire Protection District of St. Louis County v. Freedom Consulting & Auditing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Midland Property Partners, LLC v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.