Legal Opinion

East Point Lumber Co. v. Chandler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1933No. 22450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Although a plea, in a suit to recover upon a written instrument, may not expressly allege that the instrument was not the defendant’s act or deed, yet where the clear import of the plea is that the defendant did not “sign,” or did not “execute” the instrument sued on, the plea is good as one of non est factum, and is good as against a general demurrer, and is therefore amendable, not only by an amendment more specifically alleging a denial of the execution of the instrument sued on and containing allegations sufficient to constitute the plea as amended one of non est factum, good as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlas Assurance Co. v. KettlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Thomas & McCafferty v. SieselCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. McMillan v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Gunn v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Taylor v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Long Tobacco Harvesting Co. v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Lancaster v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API