Legal Opinion

E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Jardel Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 2, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

Plaintiff, the owner of business real estate located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Old Capitol trail and Newport Gap Turnpike brings this action to enjoin the defendant from collecting and dumping its surface water by means of a storm sewer into a pipe on plaintiff’s land which in turn empties into a ditch running across plaintiff’s property. This is the decision after final hearing.

Although defendant argues to the contrary, I find as a fact that we are not here concerned with a stream flowing across plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff’s lands have served for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chorman v. Queen Anne's RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  2. Saelens v. PollentierIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Staats v. HubbardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  4. Ciconte v. ShockleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  5. Ciconte v. ShockleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weldin Farms, Inc. v. GlassmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  2. Biggs v. WolfeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  3. Pierce Family, Inc. v. Magness Construction CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Glassman v. Weldin Farms, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1976
  5. EJ Hollingsworth Company v. Jardel Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API