Legal Opinion

Pierce Family, Inc. v. Magness Construction Company

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 17, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal from the Court of Chancery which denied the plaintiffs an injunction against an alleged impeding of the natural flow of water from their land.

Plaintiffs are the owners of lands in Brandywine Hundred. The natural drainage of water from these lands is into Naaman’s Creek by streams flowing through land owned by the defendant, Cedar Inn, Inc., and developed by the defendant, Magness Construction Company, by filling and the erection of apartment buildings. In the course of filling these lands, Magness blocked the streams and installed a 24-inch pipe to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chorman v. Queen Anne's RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  2. Staats v. HubbardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  3. Ciconte v. ShockleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  4. Ciconte v. ShockleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  5. McQuail v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  2. Weldin Farms, Inc. v. GlassmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. Glassman v. Weldin Farms, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API