Ciconte v. Shockley
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, Chancellor:
The question is whether the plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief against the defendant.
Ciconte, the plaintiff, owns a building consisting of seven stores, one-story high and under one roof, on the west side of First Street in the town of Rehoboth, occupied by tenants. A small part of the same building at the southern end is occupied by the plaintiff as a residence in the summer. The lot on which the building stands has a frontage of one hundred feet on First Street and a depth, between parallel lines, of fifty feet, the southern end of which abuts on Wilmington…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harlan & Hollingsworth Co. v. PaschallCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1882
- Davis v. . Niagara Falls Tower Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Chorman v. Queen Anne's RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
- Melin v. RichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Staats v. HubbardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pruett v. DaytonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
- Pruett v. DaytonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
- Ciconte v. ShockleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Jardel Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.