Legal Opinion

Ciconte v. Shockley

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 3, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, Chancellor:

The question is whether the plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief against the defendant.

Ciconte, the plaintiff, owns a building consisting of seven stores, one-story high and under one roof, on the west side of First Street in the town of Rehoboth, occupied by tenants. A small part of the same building at the southern end is occupied by the plaintiff as a residence in the summer. The lot on which the building stands has a frontage of one hundred feet on First Street and a depth, between parallel lines, of fifty feet, the southern end of which abuts on Wilmington…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harlan & Hollingsworth Co. v. PaschallCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1882
  2. Davis v. . Niagara Falls Tower Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Chorman v. Queen Anne's RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  4. Melin v. RichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. Staats v. HubbardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pruett v. DaytonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  2. Pruett v. DaytonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
  3. Ciconte v. ShockleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  4. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
  5. E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Jardel Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API