Legal Opinion

Humes v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 13, 1991No. Record No. 0086-91-2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARROW, J.

In this appeal of a conviction of second degree murder, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial because the Commonwealth failed to disclose exculpatory evidence to him. We hold that, although the evidence had exculpatory value and should have been disclosed, when considered in the context of all of the evidence offered at trial, there is no reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result would have been different. Therefore, we affirm.

The defendant and his brother surrendered themselves to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Taitano v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  4. Keener v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  5. White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gregory William Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Lemons v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
  3. Hughes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  4. Bruce Randall Allen, s/k/a Bruce Randle Allen v. CWCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  5. Garnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API