Legal Opinion

State v. . Dee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 30, 1938PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The validity of the trial is called in question by numerous exceptions and assignments of error, but consideration of them seriatim is pretermitted, as a new trial must be awarded for error in the following instruction:

“The defendants in this case, gentlemen of the jury, have gone upon the stand. This they did not have to do, but this they did do at their election and the law of this State says when a man — that is, the defendant — goes upon the stand, you, the jury, should scan and scrutinize his testimony closely, having in mind his interest in the result of your verdict and his fear of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. . EflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. State v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . StarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API