Legal Opinion
Gustafson Feis v. Mayo
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 24, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00462Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 LISA GUSTAFSON FEIS, et al., 9 Plaintiffs, Case No. C23-462-MLP 10 v. ORDER 11 KEITH MAYO, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 In this medical malpractice action, Plaintiffs Lisa Gustafson Feis and Julien Feis 16 (together, “Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, allege orthopedic surgeons Dr. Keith Mayo and Dr. 17 Christopher Boone violated Washington’s medical negligence statute, Ch. 7.70 RCW, and 18 Swedish First Hill and Proliance Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, respectively, are vicariously 19…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.