Legal Opinion

Oklahoma-Arkansas Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1930No. 8721PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

November 30, 1923, appellant and appellee entered into a contract reciting that the latter was then operating exchanges and toll lines in the states of Oklahoma and Arkansas, and that the latter was operating exchanges at Poteau, Heavener, Howe, and Wister in Oklahoma, and toll circuits extending from Poteau to Ft. Smith, Ark., and to said other named exchanges in Oklahoma. This contract provided that appellee should connect the toll lines of appellant to its toll board at Ft. Smith, Ark., and should own and maintain all central office equipment for such…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Denver & New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BoegliSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Newfield v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Woodlands Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1978
  4. Sprint Corp. v. EvansDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993
  5. Northern Kentucky Telephone Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API