Legal Opinion

Newfield v. Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1937No. 8458-8460PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

These three appeals, while brought up in separate records, present the same question and may be disposed of in one opinion. They are from interlocutory orders restraining appellants, agents of the Securities and Exchange Commission, from enforcing subpoenas duces tecum issued to the Postal and Western Union Telegraph Companies, under authority of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, IS U.S.C.A. § 77a et seq.

In the Ballentine case the subpoena required the bringing and production of “Any and all telegrams or copies thereof in your custody or control, sent or…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Reitmeister v. ReitmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. Everett W. Gross and L. Mary GrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. CaplanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API