Department of Social & Health Services v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —
Timothy Brown challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s determination that his son, T.J., is a dependent child. Notwithstanding statements to the contrary in his notice of appeal, Brown now represents to this court that he does not seek review of the dispositional order that followed the determination of dependency. We hold that the Order Finding Dependency Status is not subject to appeal, but is subject to discretionary review. We also hold that there is substantial evidence to support the challenged findings respecting dependency, and that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ChubbWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- In re NeffWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Phennah v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- K.C. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Dependency of ELFCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Department of Social & Health Services v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Dependency of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Dependency of TJBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.