Department of Social & Health Services v. Brown
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In a dependency proceeding, the trial court found Timothy Brown, Sr.’s son to be a dependent child and *838entered a dispositional order.1 Brown appealed from the dispositional order to challenge the finding of dependency. But the Court of Appeals determined that the dependency finding was not appealable and treated the matter as a motion for discretionary review. And determining that the trial court committed no obvious or probable error, the court denied review. We grant review of the Court of Appeals decision and hold that, although the court erroneously treated the appeal as a motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Welfare of KeyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ChubbWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Dependency of ELFCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- K.C. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jenkins v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Schermer v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Dependency of SchermerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re Dependency of KNJWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Clark County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.