Legal Opinion
Lacy v. G.D. Searle & Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided October 31, 1984No. Civ. A. 83C-SE-123PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Judge.
Plaintiffs seek damages against defendants Richard Raiber, M.D., and Richard Raiber, M.D., P.A. [collectively Raiber] alleging medical malpractice by Raiber in connection with services undertaken relative to the use of an IUD by plaintiff Jacqueline Lacy.
Counts IX and X charge that Dr. Raiber is liable under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Count IX charges that plaintiff employed Dr. Raiber to remove an IUD which was imbedded in her and that Dr. Raiber undertook to accomplish that result by performing a D & C, that during the procedure plaintiff’s uterus was perforated, and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- General Electric Company v. BushNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Freeman v. X-Ray Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Jones v. ElliottSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Beckett v. Beebe Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Nelson v. Fleet National BankDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
- Sides v. St. Anthony's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.