Legal Opinion
Hyden v. Circuit Court of Pulaski County
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 4, 2007No. 06-1328PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Hannah, Chief JuMiron & Foster, P.L.L.C.
James W. Hyden, and Hyden, Miron & Foster, P.L.L.C. (“Hyden”) petition this court for a writ of prohibition alleging that because more than ninety days had passed since entry of judgment, and because there was no evidence of misrepresentation by Hyden in moving for dismissal, the circuit court was without jurisdiction to vacate the judgment of dismissal under Ark. R. Civ. P. 60. We disagree and deny the petition. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(a)(3).
On June 3, 2002, Grassi filed a legal malpractice action against Hyden. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Young v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Lewellen v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Lamb & Rhodes v. HowtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- New Holland Credit Co., LLC v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foster v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Stilley v. UNIV. OF ARK. AT FT. SMITHSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Eusanio v. TippinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
- Clowers v. StickelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Austin v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.