Legal Opinion

New Holland Credit Co., LLC v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 2005No. 04-1157PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

The Chicot County Circuit Court granted AppeÜee Larry Hill’s motion to set aside a summary judgment more than seven months after the judgment was originally entered against him. Appellant New Holland Credit Company, LLC, claims on appeal that the circuit court abused its discretion in determining that it had jurisdiction under Ark. R. Civ. P. 60 (2004) to set aside the summary-judgment order. We agree and reverse and remand.

This case was certified to us by the Arkansas Court of Appeals pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(b)(6), as it involves the construction of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slaton v. SlatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Burns v. MaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Diebold v. Myers General Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Schueck Steel, Inc. v. McCarthy Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Taylor v. Zanone PropertiesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Grand Valley Ridge, LLC v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Bullock v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Hardy v. HardySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Harrill & Sutter, P.L.L.C. v. KosinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Jewell v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API